澳门六合彩

Skip to main content
Blog post

Open Science for Environmental Justice: Opportunities and Challenges

President Joe Biden receives a briefing on the response and recovery efforts in response to the 2023 Norfolk Southern train derailment, Friday, February 16, 2024, in East Palestine, Ohio. (Official White House Photo by Adam Schultz)
鈥淧20240216AS-1695鈥 by The White House. United States government work.

Introduction听

In February 2024, President Joe Biden visited East Palestine, Ohio, over a year after a Norfolk Southern train carrying hazardous chemicals听. The visit was met with mixed reactions, with some criticizing the government鈥檚 response to the derailment. Residents have, for example, questioned the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)鈥檚听 that residents were not in danger from the town鈥檚 water, soil, or air, calling for answers and additional action after residents continue to report听. Others have criticized Congress鈥 failure to pass rail safety legislation, pointing to the millions of dollars that Norfolk Southern and other industry players have spent in听.

These criticisms demonstrate the importance of centering environmental justice, defined by the听 as 鈥渢he fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people鈥ith respect to the development, implementation and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations and policies,鈥 in environmental policy and action. Residents鈥 distrust of the government, Norfolk Southern, and other actors has hindered East Palestine鈥檚 recovery, leaving many community members in limbo over a year after the derailment.听听

A lack of transparency can create distrust: In East Palestine,听 in releasing testing results and data fueled frustration and criticism from community members and advocacy groups. Power and information asymmetries can also arise from a lack of transparency between researchers and local communities. These asymmetries often perpetuate injustice: 鈥,鈥 for example, is a practice whereby outside researchers conduct research in low-income areas, then depart to publish their findings in a different space鈥搘ithout acknowledging local contributions or sharing the benefits of their research.听

Open Science

Open dialogue with other knowledge systems, open scientific knowledge, open science infrastructures, and open engagement of societal actors fitting together like puzzle pieces.
UNESCO Recommendations on Open Science (p. 11) CC BY IGO 3.0

Open science is a commitment to making the products and processes of science more inclusive, accessible, and transparent; thus, it can offer an opportunity to rebuild trust and address asymmetries between the government, the scientific community, and the public. According to , open science is 鈥渢he principle and practice of making research products and processes available to all, while respecting diverse cultures, maintaining security and privacy, and fostering collaborations, reproducibility, and equity.鈥 

Is open science a potential solution to advance trust and, in turn, environmental justice? Open science encourages researchers to make their findings and collected data publicly available, which can create direct and indirect benefits for local communities. The potential benefits for environmental justice are exemplified by  that used open data from the EPA to map how toxic air blooms around industrial plants spread into nearby neighborhoods, many of which were predominantly Black. In Verona, Missouri, the site of a manufacturing plant, the analysis led Mayor Joseph Heck to  and to (successfully) . 18 months after ProPublica鈥檚 report, the EPA proposed  for industrial facilities.

However, open science can also perpetuate distrust and exploitative practices. One ongoing challenge pertains to the relationship between open data and Indigenous Data Sovereignty, defined as 鈥.鈥 Indigenous Knowledge offers important benefits for conservation, sustainability, and other environmental action; however, environmental researchers . 

In its pursuit of making knowledge and data as accessible as possible, there is the potential that open science can infringe upon Indigenous Data Sovereignty and, in turn, . In the United States, for instance, Tribal members have raised concerns about whether the knowledge they share with federal or state agencies . 

To address these concerns, the  developed the CARE Principles to center the people and purposes connected to data. These principles are:

  • Collective Benefit: Indigenous Peoples should derive benefit from the data.
  • Authority to Control: Indigenous Peoples and governing bodies have the right to control Indigenous data.
  • Responsibility: Those working with Indigenous data have a responsibility to ensure the data are used to benefit Indigenous Peoples.
  • Ethics: Data governance must center Indigenous Peoples鈥 rights and wellbeing.
Be FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) and CARE (Collective Benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility, Ethics
Global Indigenous Data Alliance. License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED.

Opening the Process of Science 

Although conversations around open science often focus on sharing publications and data, open science also offers opportunities to involve stakeholders in multiple stages of research鈥揳s not just consumers, but also producers of knowledge. 

For example, open hardware for environmental research offers a cost-effective and accessible way to break down silos between researchers and local communities and encourage communities to independently engage in research and monitoring. , 鈥揳 low-cost, open source acoustic logger鈥揾as been tested as a potential method for detecting gunshots, to prevent poaching in protected nature preserves. Similarly, , AudioMoth was deployed to help local rangers and managers regulate the hunting of jaguars and pumas. The team鈥檚 goal is to ensure that 鈥.鈥

Making not just the products, but also the process of science more inclusive is crucial to the advancement of environmental justice. As Professor James T. Gathii expresses in 澳门六合彩鈥檚 International Day of the World鈥檚 Indigenous Peoples collection, 鈥渆nvironmental justice recognizes those disproportionately impacted by climate change not merely as victims or objects of study, but also as producers of knowledge whose agency in exposing and countering environmental injustices is crucial to understanding the threat that climate change poses.鈥 

Conclusion: Looking Forward

During his visit to East Palestine, Ohio, , 鈥淲e've tested the air, the water, the soil quality.鈥 EPA Administrator Michael Regan  that 鈥淲e believe, and know, based on the science and the data, that the air is safe.鈥 Yet the community . Whether warranted or not, the distrust that persists in East Palestine demonstrates the need for a different approach to environmental research, policy, and action. 

The President also announced  to top universities for studying the short- and long-term effects of the derailment. Open science practices, principles, and values could help expand the community鈥檚 trust in, and thus the impact of, the research that these grants produce. 

For policymakers and researchers alike, open science often encourages us to move away from rigid top-down hierarchies and information silos, towards greater collaboration and transparency. This paradigm shift has the potential to transform our efforts to build not just a more sustainable, but also a more equitable, future. 


Science and Technology Innovation Program

The Science and Technology Innovation Program (STIP) serves as the bridge between technologists, policymakers, industry, and global stakeholders.  Read more