澳门六合彩

BY MARK TEMNYCKY

In April 2019, political novice Volodymyr Zelensky defeated incumbent Petro Poroshenko in Ukraine鈥檚 presidential election in historic . Zelensky鈥檚 success then extended to the July 2019 , where his Servant of the People party won a majority of seats in the Verkhovna Rada. The results meant that Ukrainians were willing to give the inexperienced men and women of Zelensky鈥檚 party an opportunity to lead their country. Servant of the People ran on a , and the party鈥檚 victory that its members would pursue anticorruption reform in Ukraine. Zelensky鈥檚 alleged ties to Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky put some on edge, as skeptics wondered if Zelensky鈥檚 rise to power had been encouraged by Kolomoisky so that the oligarch . Nonetheless, they were willing to give Zelensky a chance.

Servant of the People pushed through of anticorruption legislation in its first few months in parliament, and the new government revitalized various anticorruption institutes. Ukraine鈥檚 gross domestic product by 3.5 percent. Zelensky negotiated a with Russia in December 2019鈥攁 decision by the West鈥攁nd also with Russia during the Normandy Summit.

Things seemed to be going well for Ukraine under Zelensky, but by March 2020 everything changed. Zelensky appointed as his new chief of staff Andriy Yermak, a person rumored to to Russia. Zelensky his cabinet of ministers, and Denys Shmyhal, a former governor who had ties to oligarch Rinat Akhmetov, became the new prime minister. The Verkhovna Rada also prosecutor general Ruslan Ryaboshapka, a decision that the West. In selecting his new cabinet, Zelensky appointed numerous figures who had ties to Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych and Ukrainian politician Viktor Medvedchuk. Zelensky, it seemed, was surrounding himself with Ukraine鈥檚 .

Beyond the internal government turmoil, there also were problems within Servant of the People. Some claim the party is fragmenting. Other reports state that the party . As a result, support for the party has significantly declined. According to a conducted by the Sociological Group Rating, support for Servant of the People has waned to 34聽percent. Zelensky鈥檚 personal popularity has also declined. During the presidential election, Zelensky won 73.2聽percent of the . By September 2020, his popularity dropped to . This sharp decline demonstrates that voters have started to .

Ukrainians expressed their frustrations with Zelensky and Servant of the People during the recent local elections, and the Ukrainian president and his party experienced their since their historic presidential and parliamentary victories in 2019. According to Ukrainian , Servant of the People in any of the prominent mayoral races. The party is also to perform well in any of the runoff elections.

The results of Ukraine鈥檚 local elections illustrate the drastic decline of Servant of the People. What was once viewed as a has now become a group synonymous with Ukraine鈥檚 corruption crisis. It is no wonder why and the have faded. Zelensky and his team will now regroup as they try to formulate a strategy on how they can maintain their influence despite this significant political loss.

Meanwhile, voter turnout in this year鈥檚 local elections fell significantly. During the 2015 local elections, Ukraine had a turnout of , and some western oblasts had a turnout of greater than 50聽percent. The turnout for the 2020 local elections, however, was . Some of the low turnout can be attributed to the precautions surrounding the coronavirus pandemic. According to a conducted by the Sociological Group Rating, 20聽percent of survey participants did not vote in the local elections citing health reasons. Another 10聽percent did not vote because of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. This means that of those surveyed did not vote because of health reasons, which is a serious matter.

The as to why Ukrainians did not vote were even more troubling. Fifteen percent stated they were too busy to vote on election day, 14聽percent said they did not know who they should vote for and thus decided not to vote, and 12聽percent said they were not interested in the local elections. In other words, 41聽percent of eligible voters provided troubling reasons for why they did not vote. These responses demonstrate that the Ukrainian electorate may be losing faith in its government.

Ukrainians may feel hopeless with their country鈥檚 current political situation. Many of the same issues that have put strains on Ukraine, such as corruption, a struggling economy, and the ongoing Donbas conflict, still remain. This has been a difficult period in Ukrainian history, and many Ukrainian families are feeling the effects of these trying times. Despite these challenges, Ukrainian voters must realize they have the power to decide their future. Traditionally, low voter turnout usually leads to the reelection of career politicians. This also means that Ukraine鈥檚 political and socioeconomic situations are unlikely to change.

If Ukrainian elections were to have higher turnouts, however, this could help change the political landscape of Ukraine. In this scenario, Ukrainian citizens could vote for better-suited and more qualified candidates, rather than for their career politicians who rely on voter apathy to retain their seats, which is that has . Such a scenario could bring about genuine change to Ukraine. Ukrainians will have to be patient before a new electoral opportunity presents itself, but they will know what kind of power they have with their vote. In the meantime, Ukrainians will watch carefully as Zelensky and Servant of the People regroup after their major political loss. Their leadership鈥檚 response may well help determine the results of the next Ukrainian election.

The opinions expressed in this article are those solely of the author and do not reflect the views of the Kennan Institute.