澳门六合彩

Skip to main content
Event

The 2020 Stefansson Memorial Lecture: Seawomen of Iceland

Date & Time

Tuesday
Dec. 1, 2020
2:30pm聽鈥撀4:00pm ET

Overview

Note: please submit any questions for the Q&A section to polar@wilsoncenter.org

Though most in modern Iceland assume seafaring was and is primarily male-dominated, Iceland鈥檚 rich written record reflects a very different reality鈥攐ne where hundreds, even thousands, of women participated consistently in sea fishing from the earliest medieval times in the mid-900s to the near present. Their insights and experiences provide a deep understanding of shipboard dynamics in the Arctic, as well as the ways female crew members may influence a ship鈥檚 working environment. Based on extensive historical and field research, Seawomen of Iceland: Survival on the Edge聽by Dr. Margaret Willson is the first large-scale study of this important鈥攁nd as yet largely invisible鈥攇roup of women, their lives, contributions to, and knowledge of Arctic fishing.

Please join us for the Stefansson Memorial Lecture to explore the importance of a gendered perspective toward fisheries policy and practices in Iceland and the wider Arctic. In partnership with Iceland鈥檚 Stefansson Arctic Institute and the Institute of Arctic Studies at Dartmouth College, 澳门六合彩鈥檚 Polar Institute is pleased to host this keynote lecture with professor and author Dr. Margaret Willson to commemorate the life and work of Vilhj谩lmur Stefansson, famed 20th century Arctic explorer, anthropologist, author, and policy advisor, to be followed by an expert panel discussion.

This event is part of a Wilson Center series held in recognition of the 16 Days of Activism against Gender-Based Violence (November 25 鈥 December 10, 2020), an international campaign to build awareness and galvanize action in the fight against violence against women and girls.

Speaker Quotes

Margaret Willson

鈥淸Throughout the early 20th century], there is gender division. There鈥檚 a lot more influence from Europe and the gender divisions are becoming much more concretized and there鈥檚 this growing idea that a woman should be a housewife鈥攖his was becoming elevated, that that was her role. The accounts begin to change, she was as good at sea as she was knitting; or it was said she liked to be as sea as much as working in the kitchen. She is still being applauded for her work at sea but she鈥檚 firmly being placed within the house and her sea work is now adjunct鈥攊t鈥檚 outside her primary role. In the early 1900s, you see this shift again. Then, you begin to get derogatory comments about women at sea but you also get the people who want to defend them [...]. It鈥檚 now unwomanly for women to go to sea. Another major thing that happened in Iceland at this time is called Iceland鈥檚 Industrial Revolution. This is when they got motorized boats, bigger boats, controller type boats that would go out for much longer and come back when they caught much more fish [...]. Guess what? In this division, the people on shore who earned very low wages were women and the people on the boats were men and this is when the sea becomes masculinized. You first start hearing reports of women not lucky on boats and things like that, they have a superstition.鈥

鈥淭he women diffused that shore-sea divide. They brought onto the boat a more integrated community that they felt was not so far from shore, that people felt more connected and this family atmosphere was quite strong.鈥

鈥淭he mobility in Iceland has increased, improved massively. The roads are much better than they used to be and people with cars can go to Reykjavik. There were some sliding away from these communities, some people are going back now. You have real big economic changes. Now, tourism (not this year) and aluminum smelting are big economic boosts. Fishing is no longer seen as the job to have. When people are looking at the job, they鈥檙e looking at better education. Women have much better access to education, their income inequality is much higher, so it鈥檚 really changed and women aren鈥檛 going into it.鈥

Embla Eir Oddsd贸ttir

鈥淭his work is casting a stronger light on what we all know to be true already, that women have been hidden creatures, invisible from the pages of history [...] and interests, knowledge, and strengths of women that have been sort of created and perpetuated, myths that are based on alternative truths which for some reason have taken a stronghold on our realities. I also think that Margaret [Willson] is providing us with role models, I think that the importance of role models should never be underestimated. It is enormously important for many reasons, but not least does it help us dispel myths and bring to light images of strong characters that can show young women of today that there may be alternative paths to choose, paths they thought were unavailable to them. Now, not saying that this means that these paths are easy or clear, they鈥檙e likely filled with obstacles, although I find that most paths do have some hurdles. It may be existing structures that resist women from taking certain paths, but knowing that other women have walked in these shoes may make the struggle to move forward a little bit more bearable.鈥

鈥淲e have made some forward strides of course, not least due to the increased number of educated women, but they still struggle to deal with the male spaces or with reaching higher levels of positions. While we find more of them in project management for instance or at middle management levels, the top layers of society are still largely populated by men, and why does this even matter? Well, we could go into a philosophical discussion on equality, fairness, just societies, and basic respect, or we could just discuss why greater diversity at higher levels of decision-making processing bodies is crucial. The places where choices are made, the road maps for our communities are laid and policies for hopefully sustainable futures are forged.鈥

 鈥淲e have found how empowerment is a recurring theme not only for women and girls but also men and boys, LGBTQ+ communities, indigenous communities, and it seems to me that this is our big task ahead: finding ways to empowerment and although it can be somewhere elusive and difficult to fathom, capture, and maintain鈥攚hether it be at group community or individual level- little pockets of empowerment can spring from unexpected sources.鈥

Linda Behnken

鈥淓very time I would see someone haul out a boat I would go offer to help paint or scrape or just find some way that I could work and help out. And eventually, when some deck hand didn鈥檛 show up or showed up drunk I got my first chance to go fishing [鈥. There weren鈥檛 that many women working on boats, but the women who were either running their own boats or working on boats were well respected.鈥

鈥淭here were skippers who preferred to hire women, especially on the trawlers because they knew women or they thought women would take really good care of the fish and were more adept at managing the gear. And then there were skippers who didn't think women were strong enough, and there were also skippers who had wives who wouldn鈥檛 let them hire women if there was just going to be the two of them on the boat. So really there was a full spectrum.鈥

鈥淚t鈥檚 really difficult to help young people come into the fisheries or get started in the fisheries, so we鈥檝e started an apprentice program to help people get that first job. We鈥檝e run over 50 people through it鈥攐ver half of them women鈥攖o give them that start.鈥


Hosted By

Polar Institute

Since its inception in 2017, the Polar Institute has become a premier forum for discussion and policy analysis of Arctic and Antarctic issues, and is known in Washington, DC and elsewhere as the Arctic Public Square. The Institute holistically studies the central policy issues facing these regions鈥攚ith an emphasis on Arctic governance, climate change, economic development, scientific research, security, and Indigenous communities鈥攁nd communicates trusted analysis to policymakers and other stakeholders.聽  Read more

Thank you for your interest in this event. Please send any feedback or questions to our Events staff.