澳门六合彩

Brazil is facing the largest outbreak of the novel coronavirus in Latin America. Although the country鈥檚 president continues to downplay the seriousness of the threat, the National Congress and state governors have mobilized rapidly to confront the disease. A federal 鈥渨ar budget鈥� and billions in additional spending, plus numerous state and municipal-level measures, form a patchwork policy response to support the public health system, businesses, and ordinary Brazilians. Yet聽the efficacy of such policy efforts鈥攑articularly for the most vulnerable Brazilians, who often live in dense urban communities without reliable access to government services鈥攊s uncertain. Meanwhile, the growing controversy surrounding President Bolsonaro, after the firing of his health minister on April 16聽and the resignation of his justice minister on April 24, threaten to draw much-needed attention away from the coronavirus response.

On Tuesday,聽April 28, the Brazil Institute hosted聽a webcast discussion of the impact of COVID-19 on Brazil鈥檚 healthcare system, economy, and social policy, amid rising political chaos.

Selected Quotes

Ambassador Thomas A. Shannon, Jr.

"There鈥檚 been enormous U.S. investment and presence in Brazil over the past decade, both in medical services, medical devices, bio and life science companies, and pharmaceutical companies or pharmacies. And this creates a connectivity that is really unique at least between North America and South America, and I would think that this would create a real opportunity for private/public partnership between the United States and Brazil.鈥�

鈥淕iven the size of our societies鈥�300 million in the United States and 200 million in Brazil鈥nd the degree of infection鈥攊t creates an enormous bed from which to work together vaccines and therapeutic treatments, and this is not something that should be lost.鈥�

Sergio Fausto

鈥淚n spite of all he has said and done that run contrary to common sense, political, conventional wisdom and science, it鈥檚 incredible how resilient has been the popular backing of Bolsonaro."聽

鈥淚s the Moro affair a turning point in this trajectory or is it just one more hit that he [Bolsonaro] will be able to absorb? My gut feeling is that this time will be different鈥oro is a symbol of the anti-corruption fight in Brazil. He was the most popular member of Bolsonaro鈥檚 cabinet. He is linked to one of the pillars of Bolsonaro鈥檚 platform, the one he ran for the presidency [with], the anti-corruption fight鈥gainst the political class.鈥�

鈥淚t is a completely different ballgame from now on because Bolsonaro will鈥ave to fight on multiple fronts. He will have to face鈥he social-economic consequences of the pandemic here, and he will have to face the juridical consequences of his acts as president of the Republic.鈥�

鈥淭he military, especially the army, are deeply entangled in this administration. They are exposed politically. It will be hard for them to disentangle鈥o, do not expect the military to take a protagonist role in this process.鈥�

Margareth Dalcolmo

鈥淏razil had the very first case of coronavirus after carnaval, in late February. So [in] Brazil, we聽had time to prepare ourselves to face this epidemic.鈥�

鈥淲e didn鈥檛 do our homework properly鈥e knew the response that would be needed. But two things complicated very much the response鈥irst of all, the ambivalences, [in] the formal discourse, I would say, from the federal government and the inconsistencies between the federal government and the governors of some states鈥ut this mess, created by these ambivalences, the result is, for me, the biggest humanitarian tragedy that we have ever seen in Brazil.鈥�

鈥淲e are going to have, differently from the European countries, a sort of younger pandemic in Brazil.鈥�

鈥淭o reopen now, would [cause] a huge humanitarian disaster in Brazil. I know I am speaking on behalf of many of my colleagues, researchers and physicians, we are strongly and clearly against reopening commerce and reopening services in Brazil at this moment.鈥�

Miguel Lago

鈥淲e have deep structural flaws in our Brazilian health system. If you look at the supply of health services, and especially if you look at the hospital system, the public hospital system鈥ome regions have enough respirators and ICU beds, [but]聽10% of the Brazilian population lives in regions where they do not have one single ICU bed or respirator. And when we look at what is required as a minimum for normal epidemiological conditions, so without looking at the crisis of COVID19, we can say that 56% of the population lives in regions where they do not have enough equipment for [normal conditions].鈥�

鈥淏ut at the same time鈥razil has an amazing health system. It is the only country with more than 100 million people in the world that offers free healthcare and free health services for all鈥razil has the biggest primary health program in the world, that is Sa煤de Fam铆lia, where聽60 percent of the population is constantly enrolled in this program鈥e can use this amazing leverage鈥o compensate for the lack of testing, in order to identify the symptoms of the population and also do聽contact tracing.鈥�

鈥淲e need to expand our hospital capacity, especially in the public sector鈥ut even if we expand a lot, we have to control the contagion. So if we do not enforce our social distancing policies鈥hat we can forecast is a disaster in terms of hospital collapse in the public system, and perhaps in the private system as well. But the public system is the one that worries me more.鈥�

Monica de Bolle

鈥淭here is no such thing as separating health from the economy. Ultimately, these two things go together and ultimately one impacts the other.鈥�

鈥淭he economy of course is not in a good place, it has not been in a good place for a while鈥e came into this crisis with very high levels of unemployment. The fiscal situation was starting to be put on track, but was still relatively weak. But then we got hit by this epidemic鈥n early March, we had identified cases of COVID19 in Brazil. And at that point the economy minister was still talking about reforms鈥hen it was really obvious that the discussion needed to change completely, to focus on getting the resources to the health system, getting protection for the vulnerable populations.鈥�

鈥淏razil has about 60 percent of its population that we can call vulnerable: these are people who are either in the informal labor market or are self-employed or are on very little income, and these are precisely the people that we needed to protect.鈥�

鈥淲hat we see already is a very sharp drop in demand, a very sharp drop in incomes鈥nd with that in mind, what we are likely to see, in the context of a political or constitutional crisis, is an unprecedented drop in GDP鈥y current best guess is a contraction of about 9 percent聽and it could be worse than that鈥ith a drop of GDP of that magnitude, we are easily talking about unemployment rates that are going to reach 20 percent or perhaps something above that. So it is a dramatic situation.鈥�

鈥淲e need the resources that are currently siting with the Ministry of Health to be passed on the states and the municipalities鈥hese resources are currently not reaching the localities that they need to reach鈥econd, we need this emergency basic income program that we鈥檝e created to actually reach the people it needs to reach. There have been issues, logistical issues with the distribution of the benefits but also with the registration of people who are eligible.鈥�

鈥淭alking about reopening in Brazil right now is completely premature. The Brazilian situation is weeks behind the U.S.聽situation, so we are still on the steep side of the epidemiological curve.鈥�