澳门六合彩

The White House just announced聽a new executive order to bolster聽 at US ports, part of the government鈥檚 efforts to secure critical infrastructure at home. The most consequential step will be聽the聽聽that are vital to port operations. Cranes now in place that were produced by the People鈥檚 Republic of China鈥檚 (PRC) state-owned company ZPMC will be replaced by cranes produced by PACEO Corp., a US-based subsidiary company of Japanese Mitsui E&S. This step also further bolsters the US-Japan partnership. Yet replacing domestic cranes just addresses the tip of the iceberg regarding maritime commerce vulnerabilities.

础蝉听 have arisen over infrastructure and tools produced at US ports, the US government aims to address cybersecurity concerns through replacing cranes with their own. Multiple US agencies have expressed聽 about the ability of these cranes to collect intelligence and their ability to disrupt freight flow during periods of tension. 聽However聽 to the Wall Street Journal, 鈥淶PMC says it controls around 70% of the global market and has sold its equipment in more than 100 countries.鈥� While the executive order may prevent the related 鈥溾�� within US shores, it still captures data on the flow of US and allied commerce globally. The 2022聽 commits to 鈥溾�mprove its ability to operate in the face of multi-domain attacks on a growing surface of vital networks and critical infrastructure, both in the homeland and in collaboration with Allies and partners at risk.鈥� Without further action outside the US, the ability for the US and its allied militaries to mobilize could be compromised. This would聽hamper the ability deter aggression.聽

Far more important than the physical construction of port infrastructure and equipment is the technology and software that runs them. It is the digital brains of the cranes that are concerning. As worrisome is Chinese-run data systems such as Logink that track the flow of cargo at ports. It is used not only at Chinese ports, but also-foreign operating聽, 鈥渋ncluding six in Japan, five in South Korea and one in Malaysia.鈥� While聽Congress recently passed an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act聽聽federal agencies such as the Pentagon from using ports that rely on Logink, it continues to track global shipments.聽

惭补苍测听聽that this 鈥渃ontrol over the flow of goods and information about them gives Beijing privileged insight into world commerce and potentially the means to influence it.鈥� The concerns are valid, given that聽 ZPMC and Logink continue to capture this important data globally.

The PRC鈥檚 focus on ports makes it a leader in providing their critical infrastructure, along with that infrastructure鈥檚 attendant vulnerabilities. The PRC has long paid attention to who controls the ports through which the world鈥檚 commerce flows, while the US is just now waking up to their importance. The PRC has聽a stake in聽聽outside of China, of which 13 are now majority Chinese-owned. 聽America聽聽enhance coordination within US 聽government agencies and with allied port operators to ensure priority international ports cannot be used for coercion or to America鈥檚 disadvantage during a period of tension or conflict. The US International Development Finance Corporation鈥檚聽聽of India鈥檚 Adani Ports to build a terminal in Sri Lanka is an important first step.聽

The US must do more than just address those maritime vulnerabilities that justify onshoring jobs in manufacturing. It needs a comprehensive strategy to address vital security gaps in domestic and global maritime commerce. It should include incentivizing US companies to provide better answers聽 for the technology that runs the world鈥檚 ports. To safeguard national security, the US must adapt a cohesive and comprehensive strategy on global ports and act beyond its borders to bolster cybersecurity at foreign-operated ports.