澳门六合彩

In a new study for the Latin American Program, Tulane University scholar David Smilde traces the evolution of Venezuela鈥檚 chavismo from its beginnings as a version of left populism based on the charisma of former President Hugo Ch谩vez, to its turn toward socialism, to its current authoritarian incarnation under Nicol谩s Maduro.

Smilde argues that a 鈥渟tarting assumption in analyzing such an authoritarian context should be stability, not change. However, there are still spaces and resources that provide opportunities for working for a return to democracy.鈥�

Maduro鈥檚 unpopular regime has sought to keep power, on the one hand, by preventing the rise of independent moderates within its ranks and by forging new international alliances, and, on the other hand, by undermining Venezuela鈥檚 electoral institutions, repressing opposition politicians and activists, and restricting and manipulating mass and digital media.

Nevertheless, Smilde argues that Maduro鈥檚 control over his coalition and Venezuelan society is far from complete. He suggests that the existence of a weakened but still active political opposition, a dynamic civil society, and widespread democratic values in the population are assets that keep the search for a democratic outcome alive.